The Poverty of Nations
GDP measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.
Numbers Are The Most Successful Liars In History
There is a number that runs the world. It is not the number in your bank account, though you think about that one enough. It is not the number on your bathroom scale, though you think about that one even more. It is a number so abstract, so divorced from the texture of human experience, that the man who invented it spent the rest of his career begging people to stop using it the way they were using it. Nobody listened. They never do. That number is GDP.
Gross Domestic Product. Say it out loud. Gross Domestic Product. It sounds like something you’d find at the bottom of a neglected refrigerator. And in a sense, that’s exactly what it is: a congealed mass of unrelated things shoved together and labeled as though it represents something coherent. A billion dollars in weapons manufacturing and a billion dollars in cancer treatment and a billion dollars in divorce lawyers and a billion dollars in oil spills that require a billion dollars to clean up. GDP counts them all the same. GDP goes up. The chart looks great. The president, or the prime minister, or the chairman, or the generalissimo, gets to stand behind a podium and say the economy is growing.
You know what else is growing? The tumors that your GDP just counted the treatment for. Congratulations.
Simon Kuznets developed the national income accounting framework in 1934 and immediately, with the frantic urgency of a man who has just built a weapon and can see the generals eyeing it, told the United States Congress that:
“the welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income.”
He said this in 1934. He said it again. He kept saying it. He said it so many times that you’d think at least one person in a position of authority would have listened. Instead, they gave him a Nobel Prize in 1971, quoted the part about measuring national income, and left out the part about it being meaningless as a welfare indicator. This is the intellectual equivalent of reading the warning label on a bottle of bleach, noting that it is an effective cleaning product, and then drinking it.
Robert F. Kennedy, three months before he was murdered, stood at the University of Kansas and said:
“GDP measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile.”
Bobby Kennedy could see the fraud in 1968. Fifty-seven years later, every government on Earth still acts as though GDP tells you something about how people actually live. It doesn’t. It tells you how much economic activity occurred, which is a bit like measuring the health of a hospital by how many patients it admits. The sicker the population, the better the hospital looks.
The real trick, the part that makes GDP not merely a bad metric but an actively evil one: it is an average.
GDP per capita divides the total economic output of a nation by its total population, and this single act of division is the most sophisticated lie in the history of mathematics.
When you divide Aliko Dangote’s $13.5 billion fortune by 220 million Nigerians, you get a number that implies each Nigerian has a share of Dangote’s wealth. They do not. They have never seen it. Most of them have never had reliable electricity. But the math says they’re fine. The math says Nigeria’s economy is Africa’s largest. The math is a bitch.
There is a famous thought experiment. Ten people are sitting in a bar. Each earns $35,000 a year. The average income in the bar is $35,000. Bill Gates walks in. The average income in the bar is now ~$100b billion divided by eleven, which is approximately $9 billion per person. Nobody in that bar got richer. But the “average” just told you they’re all billionaires. That is GDP per capita. That is the number that runs the world. That is the number your government waves around like a diploma from a university that doesn’t exist.
And if that seems like a fun intellectual exercise, a cute dinner party anecdote, wait until you see what it does to countries where the Bill Gates equivalent is a dictator’s son with a $100 million yacht and the other ten people in the bar are drinking contaminated water.
The real question is not whether GDP is a lie. Of course it’s a lie. The real question is: why does everyone keep telling it?
The Goodhart Casino
There is a law in economics called Goodhart’s Law. It states:
“When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.”
Charles Goodhart formulated this in 1975, and it is the single most ignored insight in the history of social science, which is saying something, because social science is essentially a discipline built on ignored insights.
GDP was supposed to be a thermometer. It became a thermostat. Somewhere between 1944, when the Bretton Woods conference established the postwar economic order with GDP as its lingua franca, and now, the number stopped describing economies and started directing them.
No one decided this. Incentives decided it.
Incentives are smarter than people.
Here is how the game works:
GDP determines everything. It determines who sits at the table and who serves the food. The G20, that club of nations whose finance ministers meet in nice hotels to discuss the fate of the other 175 countries not in the room, has one unofficial but absolute criterion for membership: GDP. You need a large enough economy to matter. The G7 is even more exclusive, essentially the countries whose GDP peaked earliest and who wrote the rules while everyone else was still colonized. The OECD, that club of “developed” nations, uses GDP per capita thresholds to determine who qualifies. NATO membership doesn’t technically require a GDP threshold, but the expectation that members spend 2% of GDP on defence means the number determines your military obligations, your strategic relevance, your seat at the security table.
Credit ratings agencies, those private companies that function as the unofficial gods of the global financial system, use GDP growth as a primary input for sovereign credit ratings. A higher rating means cheaper borrowing. Cheaper borrowing means more money. More money means more GDP. It is a circle so virtuous that it is actually a spiral, and the countries at the bottom are spinning in the other direction: low GDP means low ratings means expensive borrowing means less investment means low GDP. Economists call this a “poverty trap.” A more honest name would be “the game was rigged before you sat down.”
(And on this topic I recommend my piece on the poker game of life)
Foreign direct investment, the lifeblood of developing economies, follows GDP growth the way seagulls follow a trawler. Investors do not read reports about infant mortality or access to clean water. They read condensed and most importantly, compressed reports about GDP growth. A kind of radical and efficient modern compression that smoothes out death and despair.
A country growing at 7% gets capital inflows. A country growing at 1% gets abandoned. The money follows the number, which means every government on Earth has an overwhelming incentive to make the number go up by whatever means necessary, regardless of whether those means make anyone’s life better.
(read my very relevant piece about statistics and perverse incentives)
Whatever means necessary, turns out to include quite a lot.
Population growth increases GDP mechanically, because more people means more economic activity even if each individual person is worse off. So countries that want the number to go up have an incentive to grow their populations, whether through natalist policies or, more commonly in developed nations, through mass immigration. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is arithmetic.
Australia’s GDP growth averaged 2.3% in the decade before COVID, and roughly two-thirds of that growth came from population increase rather than productivity gains. The GDP went up. GDP per capita barely moved. But the headline number, the one that gets reported, the one that keeps you in the G20, the one that the credit agencies look at, is the big one. The total. The one that goes up when you add people, even if each person is individually poorer, more crowded, and paying more for housing than they were before.
And this is the perversity at the heart of the system: adding a million immigrants who drive down wages and drive up housing costs will increase GDP while making the median citizen measurably worse off. The government gets to stand at the podium. The chart looks great. The economy is growing. Your rent went up 40% and your real wages declined for the third year running, but the economy is growing. You’re welcome.
Ireland is the reductio ad absurdum. In 2015, Ireland’s GDP grew by 25.6% in a single year, a figure so absurd that the economist Paul Krugman coined the term “leprechaun economics” to describe it. What happened? Apple and other multinationals restructured their intellectual property holdings through Ireland to take advantage of low corporate tax rates. Hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity were suddenly “located” in Ireland that had no relationship to anything that happened in Ireland. Nobody got a raise. Nobody got a job. But Ireland’s GDP exploded, its debt-to-GDP ratio improved dramatically, and its position in the European economic order was enhanced. The Irish Central Statistics Office was so embarrassed that they invented a new metric, “modified GNI,” to strip out the distortions. Nobody uses it. They still report GDP.
Nigeria rebased its GDP in 2014 and jumped 89% overnight. Same population. Same poverty. Same 767 factories that would close by 2023. But the number went up, and that meant Nigeria was suddenly “Africa’s largest economy,” which meant different treatment from the IMF, different positioning in investment indices, different standing in every room where standing matters. Then in 2025 they did it again, another 34.4% increase, because if the trick works once, why stop? The gap between Nigeria’s GDP and Nigeria’s reality is now so wide that you could lose an entire population in it. Which, in a sense, they have. 106 million Nigerians live in extreme poverty. But the number that determines whether the world takes Nigeria seriously keeps going up, so the world keeps taking Nigeria seriously, and the 106 million remain exactly where they are: below the number, invisible to it, unhelped by it.
This is Goodhart’s Law operating at civilizational scale. The measure became the target. And once it became the target, it stopped measuring anything except itself. Countries no longer grow their economies to improve lives. They improve their GDP to attract investment to grow their GDP to attract more investment. The people inside the economy are, at best, a means to this end, and at worst, an inconvenient denominator that drags the per capita figure down.
The question you should be asking is not “why is GDP misleading?” The question is: “what happens to the 7.8 billion people who live inside economies that have been optimised for a number that has nothing to do with them?”
The answer is in the next chapter. And every chapter after that.
How To Build Paradise On Top of a Garbage Dump
The Philippines has a GDP of roughly $404 billion. The world’s 32nd-largest economy. GDP per capita around $3,549. These are the numbers that appear in investment brochures and World Bank reports and the kind of PowerPoint presentations that make men in suits nod approvingly and say things like “emerging market.” The Philippines is indeed emerging. It has been emerging for about sixty years. It keeps emerging. It never arrives. But as long as the GDP growth rate stays above 5%, the investment keeps flowing and the PowerPoints keep getting made, and arrival is not the point. The number is the point.
Here is what has arrived: Tondo.
Tondo is a district in Manila. It is not a slum; it is a civilization built on refuse. 654,220 human beings. Within Tondo there is a place called Happyland, which is its actual name, and if you think that sounds like something a sociopath would name a concentration camp, you are beginning to understand the aesthetic sensibility of Third World poverty statistics. Happyland sits on what used to be the Smokey Mountain garbage dump. 12,000 people live there now, on top of decades of compressed garbage, in structures made of scavenged materials, in an area where the ground itself is decomposing trash.
In Happyland, women peel garlic. That’s the job. That’s the career. They sit in rooms that you would not store luggage in and they peel garlic for ₱80 per day. That’s $1.53. A full day’s work. A large coffee at an American chain costs more than that. Nobody thinks about this when they buy the coffee. That’s the point. The architecture of global pricing is specifically designed so that nobody thinks about this when they buy the coffee.
Nearly 50% of Metro Manila’s population lives in slums. Half the capital. The Philippines is the most food-insecure country in Southeast Asia. A country of 115 million people, many of whom work in agriculture, cannot reliably feed itself. Not because the land is barren. Not because the climate is hostile. Because when your garlic peelers earn $1.53 a day and your GDP says the economy is growing at 5.6%, someone is clearly doing well and it isn’t the garlic peelers. The GDP of the Philippines grows like a tumor: measurably, consistently, and to the benefit of absolutely no one who needs it. But it grows. And as long as it grows, the Philippines remains an “emerging market,” which is an analyst’s way of saying “a place where foreign capital can extract returns.”
The World’s Fastest Growing Hallucination
India’s economy grew at 7.3% in 2023-24. This is the number that appears on CNBC. This is the number that makes fund managers salivate. This is the number that has generated approximately four thousand LinkedIn posts with titles like “India: The Next Economic Superpower?” India is indeed the world’s fifth-largest economy by nominal GDP. It is growing faster than China. It is a growth miracle, and it has to be, because a growth miracle is the only thing standing between India and irrelevance in the rooms where relevance is denominated in GDP.
The miracle is not audible in Dharavi.
Dharavi is a slum in Mumbai. You might know it from Slumdog Millionaire, which is a film about a boy who escapes from poverty, and which was primarily consumed by people in developed nations who found it “inspiring” and then went back to complaining about their landlords. Dharavi houses somewhere between 700,000 and one million people. The exact number is unknown because the Indian census has difficulty counting people who live in spaces smaller than a parking spot. The population density is 277,136 people per square kilometer. Manhattan is about 28,000. Dharavi is ten Manhattans stacked on top of each other. Except instead of penthouse apartments and Whole Foods stores, it’s corrugated metal and open sewage.
A few kilometers from Dharavi stands Antilia, Mukesh Ambani’s personal residence. Twenty-seven stories. 400,000 square feet. Three helipads. A six-story parking garage for 168 cars. A snow room that produces artificial snowflakes. A staff of 600. Estimated value between $1 billion and $4.6 billion. The electricity consumption is roughly equivalent to a town of 2,000 people. It is visible from Dharavi. You can stand in the open sewer and look up at a 27-story monument to one man’s inability to know when he has enough, glittering against the Mumbai skyline like a middle finger made of glass and steel. Ambani’s wealth is GDP. The sewer is also GDP. The statistic contains both and distinguishes between neither.
India has 162 million people without access to a toilet. India’s stock market is at record highs. These two facts coexist, peacefully, in the world’s fastest-growing major economy.
India has 61 million stunted children. Stunting is permanent. It reshapes the skeleton. It limits cognitive development. One-third of all malnourished children on Earth live in India. Not one-third of Asian malnourished children. One-third of all of them. India has more stunted children than the entirety of sub-Saharan Africa, despite having a significantly higher per capita income. Economists call this the “South Asian Enigma,” which is a polite way of saying “we have no idea why a country this statistically rich has children this visibly starving.”
Here is the idea: India’s GDP growth has been optimised for the metric, not the people. The 7.3% goes to Ambani and the tech sector and the financial services industry that caters to foreign investors. The 61 million stunted children are not on the balance sheet. They are the cost of the number going up.
793 million Indians cannot afford a healthy diet. The GDP is growing at 7.3%. Maybe the children will grow with it. They haven’t yet. They’ve been waiting for about forty years.
The World’s Largest Magic Trick, and the World’s Smallest
On April 6, 2014, Nigeria “rebased” its GDP, a technical process of updating the base year used for calculating economic output, and overnight, the economy jumped 89%. Nigeria instantly overtook South Africa as Africa’s largest economy. Headlines announced the arrival of an economic giant. The World Bank adjusted its classifications. Investment reports were rewritten. Nigeria’s seat at every table got slightly more comfortable.
170 million Nigerians woke up the next morning exactly as poor as they had been the morning before.
Analyst Bismarck Rewane asked: “Is the money in your bank account more on Sunday than it was on Saturday?” Nothing had changed. Not one naira had moved. Nigeria simply recounted its money and declared itself richer. The economic equivalent of weighing yourself in kilograms instead of pounds and celebrating the weight loss. Except this weight loss gets you a better credit rating.
Then in 2025 they did it again. Another 34.4% increase. Meanwhile, in 2023, 767 factories closed. The economy was growing. The factories were closing. Because those are different sentences about different things, and the first sentence is the one that attracts foreign capital, and the second sentence is the one that happens to people.
The actual situation: 106 million Nigerians live in extreme poverty. At the $3.65/day threshold, 70% of all Nigerians are poor. In Africa’s largest economy by GDP.
Now consider the opposite trick. Equatorial Guinea has a GDP per capita exceeding $26,000, making it wealthier per person than Poland, Hungary, or Chile. An economist looking only at GDP per capita would classify it as upper-middle-income and move on to the next spreadsheet.
97.8% of the population lives below $5.50 per day.
How can 97.8% of people be poor in a country that is statistically wealthy? Because President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo and his family took the oil money. Basically all of it. Between 2009 and 2013, the government spent 3.5% of oil revenue on education and 2.3% on health. The other 94% went elsewhere. Obiang’s son, Teodorin, was convicted of corruption by French courts. He owned a $100 million mansion on Avenue Foch, a Gulfstream jet, a $30 million Malibu estate, and a collection of Michael Jackson memorabilia. Meanwhile, only half his father’s subjects have access to clean drinking water.
Nigeria is the big trick: make a poor country look rich by counting louder, and reap the geopolitical rewards. Equatorial Guinea is the small trick: one family swallows the GDP whole, and the per capita figure distributes their yacht across 1.4 million people who have never seen a paved road. Different mechanisms, same fraud. And both countries’ GDP numbers appear in the same World Bank databases, treated with the same seriousness, feeding the same investment models, as if the numbers describe something real.
600 Million People Aren’t Enough to Hear
China’s GDP is $18 trillion. The world’s second-largest economy. 800 million people lifted out of poverty in forty years. This is the story that justifies everything: the surveillance state, the labour camps, the censorship, the one-party rule. You don’t like our politics? Look at the GDP. It is perhaps the most successful deployment of Goodhart’s Law in human history: the Chinese Communist Party made GDP growth the explicit metric of governance, tied local officials’ promotions to GDP targets, and watched as every province in China began optimizing for the number with the ruthless efficiency that authoritarian systems excel at. Ghost cities were built because construction is GDP. Bridges to nowhere were built because infrastructure spending is GDP. Provincial GDP figures were so inflated that their sum routinely exceeded the national total by trillions of yuan, a mathematical impossibility that nobody was punished for because everybody was playing the same game.
(a personal favourite, i write on capitalism with chinese characteristics here)
And then, on May 28, 2020, Premier Li Keqiang said something that was not supposed to be said. “There are still some 600 million people whose monthly income is barely 1,000 yuan.” That’s $140 per month. $4.67 per day. “It’s not even enough to rent a room in a mid-sized Chinese city.” The world’s second-largest economy. 600 million people. Not enough to rent a room.
Updated figures are even more staggering: 964 million Chinese people earn under 2,000 yuan per month, about $282. More people than the entire population of Europe and the United States combined. The majority of the population of the world’s second-largest economy earns less per month than what a Western worker earns in a day and a half.
Shanghai’s GDP per capita exceeds $27,000, comparable to some European countries. Rural Gansu province: roughly $4,000. A seven-to-one ratio within the same country. Shanghai is what China looks like on the investment brochure. Shanghai is the outlier that the average is trying desperately to include so that the number doesn’t look like what it actually is.
Between 60 and 69 million Chinese children are classified as “left-behind children.” Their parents have migrated to distant cities for factory work, leaving them in rural villages to be raised by elderly grandparents. These children grow up without parents, in villages that are depopulating, attending schools that are underfunded, in an economy that their parents’ labour supports but whose benefits their parents will never see. Their parents live in factory dormitories in Shenzhen and Guangzhou, building consumer electronics, earning salaries that Li Keqiang himself admitted are not enough to rent a room.
The last time you upgraded your phone, the old one still worked. The upgrade cost more than a Chinese factory worker in the bottom 40% earns in a year. Their child is growing up without them. GDP counted the purchase and the labour and called it growth. A beautiful system, if you don’t think about it. Which is the entire point of GDP: to make sure you don’t think about it.
The Floor of the World
There are countries where GDP doesn’t lie. There are countries where GDP tells the truth, and the truth is so terrible that the lying almost seems like a mercy. These are the countries at the very bottom of every list, the ones that appear in footnotes and “data not available” entries. They are where most of human suffering actually occurs, and they are the countries that the GDP-indexed global order has the least incentive to think about, because their numbers are too small to matter in any room where numbers determine who matters.
South Sudan has a GDP per capita of $251 per year. The lowest on Earth. Only 8.4% of the population has access to electricity. 91.6% of people have never turned on a light switch. Have never plugged in a phone. Have never used a refrigerator. Your entire experience of modern civilization, everything that distinguishes your Monday from a Monday in the fourteenth century, requires electricity. They don’t have it.
Only 17% of pregnant women receive antenatal care. UNICEF reports describe women giving birth on dirt floors, umbilical cords cut with sticks. The maternal mortality rate is 1,223 per 100,000 live births. In developed nations, it is about 3 to 10. A woman giving birth in South Sudan is 407 times more likely to die than a woman giving birth in Melbourne or Manchester or Minneapolis. That is not a disparity. That is a different planet.
7.56 million people face crisis-level food insecurity. 28,000 are in “Phase 5: Catastrophe” on the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, defined as two or more deaths per 10,000 people per day from starvation. There is no Phase 6. Phase 6 is when there are no longer enough people alive to count the dead.
The Democratic Republic of Congo is the world’s largest cobalt producer. The cobalt in your phone battery, your laptop battery, your electric car battery. Also significant copper, diamonds, gold, and coltan. One of the most resource-rich nations on Earth. GDP per capita: $600 to $704. 65% of its 100 million people live on less than $2.15 per day. The national food supply provides 1,605 calories per person per day, 43% below the minimum recommended intake. The country that provides the raw materials for your devices cannot feed its people. Its resources show up in the GDP of every country except its own, or rather, they show up in its GDP too, but the GDP goes to the warlords and the multinational intermediaries and the refined-product manufacturers, and the Congolese miner who dug the cobalt out of a collapsed tunnel with his hands gets a few dollars and a statistic.
Chad has a life expectancy of 54 years. Only 6% have safely managed drinking water. Female adult literacy is 14%. There are 0.5 doctors per 10,000 people. Developed nations average 30 to 40. A Chadian walked six hours to a clinic that had no medicine and considered it Tuesday. The clinic exists because an NGO built it. The NGO’s funding comes from a donor nation. The donor nation’s contribution is tax-deductible and appears in its own GDP as a charitable expenditure. Everyone’s GDP benefits from Chad’s suffering except Chad’s.
These are not outliers. The floor of the world is enormous, and it is crowded, and it is silent in every way that matters to anyone with the power to hear it. These countries will never join the G20. They will never receive a favourable credit rating. Their GDP is too small to register as anything other than a rounding error in the global economy, which means the system that runs on GDP has no mechanism for caring about them, and no incentive to build one.
The Arithmetic of One Child Per Minute
Malaria killed 610,000 people in 2024. Seventy-five percent of African malaria deaths are children under five. Roughly one child every 69 seconds. Malaria is not a mystery. It is transmitted by mosquitoes. We know how to prevent it. We know how to treat it. Forty-seven countries have eliminated it entirely. It kills where poverty kills, and only where poverty kills, and the fact that it still kills 610,000 people per year is not a failure of medicine. It is a failure of allocation. Nigeria alone accounts for 39.3% of all child malaria deaths globally. In Africa’s largest economy. In the country that has rebased its GDP twice. The GDP went up. The malaria deaths stayed the same. Almost as if they are unrelated phenomena. Which they are.
Diarrheal diseases killed approximately 444,000 children under 5 in 2024. “Diarrheal diseases” is the clinical term for “died because the water was poisoned.” The treatment is oral rehydration salts: sugar, salt, and clean water. Less than a dollar. The child dies because nobody can get the dollar to the right place at the right time.
4.8 million children under 5 died in 2023. 13,100 per day. 546 per hour. Nine per minute. Since you started reading this essay, somewhere in the low hundreds of children have died of preventable causes in countries whose GDP numbers went up this year. The line on the chart climbed. The children did not. These two trends will continue to coexist peacefully, because the line and the children have nothing to do with each other. They never did.
The Gini in the Bottle
South Africa has a Gini coefficient of 0.63, the highest on Earth. The top 0.01%, roughly 3,500 individuals, own 15% of all wealth. The bottom 50% have negative net wealth: on average, they owe about $850 more than they own. There are gated communities with private security and heated swimming pools and German cars, and there are townships where five people share a single room and the toilet is communal. These two South Africas exist simultaneously, geographically adjacent, separated by walls and razor wire and the most powerful border in the world, which is not a national border but a class border.
Globally: the 12 richest billionaires hold $2.635 trillion. The poorest half of humanity, 4.1 billion people, hold $2.567 trillion. Twelve people have more than four billion. Billionaire wealth surged $2.5 trillion in 2025 alone. That single-year increase was roughly equal to the total wealth of the bottom 4.1 billion. One year of twelve people’s gains could eradicate extreme poverty 26 times over.
Twenty-six times over. Not their total wealth. Not liquidating everything they own. Just the increase. The yearly bonus. The annual top-up. The amount by which their number got bigger while they slept.
This is not presented as an argument for redistribution, or against billionaires, or for any particular policy. I am a staunch capitalist at heart afterall. But also, I have a heart.
The Welfare Aristocracy
Every developed nation has a class of people it considers failures. In America they are “on welfare,” a phrase spoken with the same inflection one might use for “in prison.” In the UK they are “on the dole” or “on Universal Credit,” and they are the subject of reality television programmes designed to make employed people feel better about their mortgages. In Australia they are “on Centrelink,” which is the name of the government services agency, and they are called “dole bludgers,” which is Australian slang for someone who is lazy and sponges off the system. Every developed nation has its own version of this person, and every developed nation treats this person as the floor: the lowest rung, the cautionary tale, the person who could not or would not participate in the economy, and who therefore lives on the scraps that the economy’s conscience provides.
These people, the dole bludgers, the welfare queens, the universal credit claimants, the ones who their own countries consider the least productive, least deserving, least contributing members of their societies, are richer than 80% of all humans who have ever lived or who are currently alive.
An Australian on JobSeeker, the unemployment benefit, receives approximately $13,000 USD per year. This is below the Australian poverty line. It is genuinely difficult to live on. But it places the recipient in roughly the top 15 to 20% of the global income distribution. Seven times the global median income of approximately $2,920 USD. One fortnight’s payment, roughly $530 USD, exceeds what a citizen of Burundi earns in an entire year. The annual total is 46 times Burundi’s GDP per capita. 19.6 times the DRC’s. Six times Nigeria’s. A British claimant on Universal Credit, an American on a combination of SNAP and housing assistance, a Canadian on employment insurance: all of them, by the standards of the planet they live on, are aristocrats. They are the richest poor people in the history of the species.
And they don’t have to do anything.
It is not the size of the number. It is the condition attached to it. A garlic peeler in Manila earns $1.53 for fourteen hours of work. A cobalt miner in the DRC earns a few dollars for a day underground that may kill him. A subsistence farmer in Chad works from sunrise to sunset, every day, in conditions that will reduce his life expectancy to 54 years, and earns barely enough to not die. These people labour. They labour harder than almost anyone in a developed nation has ever laboured or will ever be asked to labour. And they earn a fraction of what a developed-world welfare recipient earns for doing, by definition, nothing.
The person watching television in government-subsidised housing in Sydney or London or Toronto, the person their own society has designated as the least productive member of the national community, earns more by sitting still than a working human being in the bottom quartile of the global population earns through a full year of physical toil. The “bludger” out-earns the worker. The “failure” out-earns the farmer. The person who has opted out of their own economy is still, by the accident of being inside a wealthy nation’s borders, wealthier than the vast majority of people who are working themselves to death inside poor ones.
But the welfare recipient’s real wealth is not the cash. The cash is almost a rounding error compared to what they receive in kind. Every citizen of a developed nation, including welfare recipients, has access to: universal healthcare, or at minimum emergency care by law. Clean treated tap water from every faucet. 24/7 electricity. 13 years of free public education. Emergency services via a three-digit phone number. Sealed roads. Street lighting. A justice system that, while imperfect, does not involve warlords.
2.1 billion people globally lack safely managed drinking water. 750 million lack any access to electricity. 3.8 billion people, roughly half the world, have no social protection of any kind. No welfare. No safety net. Nothing between them and starvation except their own labour and the weather. If the crop fails, they starve. If they get sick, they either recover or they don’t. If their child is born with a complication, the child dies. There is no ambulance to call. There is no hospital to go to. There is no system. There is only them.
Sierra Leone’s maternal mortality rate is 1,360 per 100,000 live births. More than a third of all young women who die in Sierra Leone die because they got pregnant. Not from complications. From the pregnancy itself. In a developed nation, this is so rare it makes the news. In Sierra Leone, it is everyday. Niger had 288 doctors for 14 million people. One 2009 study in south-central Somalia found 11 doctors serving 600,000 people.
Branko Milanovic has calculated that 60 to 80% of income variation globally is explained by one variable: the country in which you were born. Not your education. Not your work ethic. Not your intelligence. Your passport. He calls it the “citizenship premium.” Run Rawls’ veil of ignorance as an actual lottery, weighted by population. You would be born into poverty approximately 85% of the time. You are not in the 85%. The reason is not that you are smarter or harder working or more deserving. The reason is that you are luckier. Everything else, all the bootstraps and the hustle culture and the grind, operates within the remaining 20 to 40%.
The dole bludger won the lottery. That’s all. They won the lottery and then lost the smaller game inside it, the domestic game, the one where you compete against other lottery winners for relative position. And even losing that game still leaves them richer, safer, healthier, and longer-lived than the vast majority of the human race. Their floor is most of the world’s ceiling.
The Poverty of Nations
Adam Smith called his book The Wealth of Nations because he believed he was describing how nations become rich. He was an optimist. He thought the invisible hand of the market would generate prosperity for all. He was half right. The invisible hand did generate prosperity. It just generated it in about twenty countries and used the other hundred and seventy as raw material.
The poverty of nations is not an accident. It is not a natural condition. It is the result of systems, and those systems have architects, and those architects have addresses, and those addresses are in the twenty countries that got rich. The poverty of nations is the other side of the wealth of nations. It is the cost that doesn’t appear on the balance sheet.
And the most successful thing those systems ever produced was not wealth. It was the metric that hides the poverty. GDP is not a measurement. It is a spell. It transforms 106 million Nigerians living in poverty into “Africa’s largest economy.” It transforms 964 million Chinese earning under $282 a month into “the world’s second superpower.” It transforms a country where 97.8% of people live on less than $5.50 a day into “an upper-middle-income nation.” And it transforms the response to all of this from outrage into policy, from horror into “development indicators,” from a scream into a spreadsheet. It performs these transformations in plain sight, and it does them so well that even the economists who study inequality, even the politicians who have read the Kuznets warning, still use the number, still cite it, still build their careers around it. Because the game requires it. Because their country’s credit rating depends on it. Because their seat at the G20 depends on it. Because the foreign investment depends on it. Because every incentive in the global order points toward making the number go up, and no incentive at all points toward asking what the number actually means.
Kuznets built the thermometer. Bretton Woods turned it into a thermostat. Goodhart predicted exactly what would happen. Kennedy eulogized the warning. Stiglitz, Sen, and Milanovic built entire careers documenting the deception. Nobody listened. Nobody ever listens. The incentives are too strong. The number is too useful. The game is too profitable for the people sitting at the table to ask who is under it.
The number goes up. The chart looks good. The children keep dying.
I’ve been binge reading your articles for about an hour now. You’re a talented writer with a wide range of interests, and even more impressive is how deep you dive into each topic. I feel intellectually stimulated and inspired by your writing.
hey man i am following you on twitter also, still wondering why you still have less post views, your writing quality is top notch and posts are so exclusive and better than the slop that get more views, to me you should be in top substack writers list, maybe it's their algorithm, idk, can you write something about stock market more in deep, manipulation etc etc